Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treelodge@Punggol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 22:20, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Treelodge@Punggol

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional Article Jayakumar RG (talk) 16:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio

^{Let's talk about it!} 09:32, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - In it's old name, this book goes very in-depth about the topic. This article in the Business Standard is significant as well. In its current name, there are many other significant sources. [1][2][3][4] And it was noted by the Singapore Institute of Architects for winning a International Architecture Award. Re-writing is in order to make it less promotional, not AfD. --Oakshade (talk) 03:43, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 01:09, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.