Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trees for Canterbury

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:31, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trees for Canterbury

Non notable organisation. Probably should have been deleted on Jan 3rd, 2005, but debate was never closed. See old discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trees for Canterbury (1st nomination) Mikker ^(...) 02:03, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, nn organisation. 556 Ghits [1] — Kimchi.sg | Talk 04:08, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above, 125 unique hits. Royboy crashfan 05:10, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn organisation Gu 08:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. James Kendall [talk] 10:58, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn org. --Ter e nc e Ong 13:34, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:02, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.