Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trialectics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:23, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trialectics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All of the articles in the bibliography are from the official website. I can't find anything to support WP:GNG. Seems like it falls under WP:ONEDAY. Bordwall(^talk⁄_ctrb) 16:51, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree with nom about notability issues, and even just reading the article it's almost entirely composed of business jargon / puffery, ie "promotes integral development", "attend the requirements of an intelligent community", etc. Pishcal — ♣ 17:16, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not the place to promote one man's new vision of the world. Kraxler (talk) 01:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.