Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trini & Carmen's Mexican Cuisine
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sounds yummy though. I think I'll run out and get some fajitas :) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Trini & Carmen's Mexican Cuisine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This organization does not appear to meet WP:CORP. References in the article are self-published or local in nature and to not appear to indicate notability. VQuakr (talk) 23:33, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete no assertation of notability. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 23:50, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not a single independent source giving more than a brief mention. Written by an editor with a conflict of interest, probably for promotional purposes. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:21, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - a local restaurant with purely local coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 20:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - none of the sources are truly reliable, opinion polls and reviews. There is no assertion of notability in the article. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 18:52, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.