Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristan Pollock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:25, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tristan Pollock

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. As mentioned by multiple editors on the talk page, there’s a dearth of significant coverage by secondary reliable sources on this person. A Google search fails to find any mention of this person as well. Transcendence (talk) 03:35, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Transcendence (talk) 03:35, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:13, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:13, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Appears to be a failed attempt at using Wikipedia for promotion. All sources availlable are primary sources from the person's personal website or interviews/self published articles. Michepman (talk) 16:45, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This has the look and feel of a paid promo. No significant coverage of the subject can be found. Sorely fails WP:GNG. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 18:13, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sourcing on this is weak, mostly leads back to non-reliable promotional sites or brief mentions. No serious coverage, fails WP:GNG.Bonewah (talk) 14:20, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Concur with above editors, promotional, no significant coverage, doesn't pass WP:GNG. Isaidnoway (talk) 17:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above. Bacondrum (talk) 23:45, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.