Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tullahoma (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn per consensus. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tullahoma (disambiguation)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PTM, none of these things has the exact name "Tullahoma". The only content on Wikipedia with the exact name "Tullahoma" is Tullahoma (album) which I just created. Tullahoma itself is just a redirect to Tullahoma, Tennessee and probably not even the album needs a disambiguation term. But either way, this is not a valid dab since nothing on it is exactly named "Tullahoma". Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:48, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:05, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would keep this one. Both airports and military campaigns have a tendency to be abbreviated to a single name. BD2412 T 22:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I agree with BD2412. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:10, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - not all PTMs; airport, military campaign, high school, and album are commonly referred to as the single name. Remove the PTMs from the page. Bneu2013 (talk) 06:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: album, airport, campaign all merit a link, so a hatnote on the city article would be overburdened. Valid and useful dab page. PamD 09:27, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. MB 06:14, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.