Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tumi Acho Hridoye

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:04, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tumi Acho Hridoye

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"After releasing on YouTube all viewers gave positive comments. Like, "One of the best film i have ever seen, the songs have so much to understand, the heart is touched, the film brings tears to my eyes""!!

Anyway i don't think it’s notable film. There isn't enough reliable independent source about this film. All of them are either passing mentions or source from vanity sites. Fails WP:GNG. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:17, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Bangladesh. Shellwood (talk) 15:52, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The sources that could be found, in English or Bengali, are passing mentions, not significant coverage. The reception section, full of poor machine translations, is particularly problematic. It glues together brief platitudinous remarks about actors a decade or more later: "got a lot of love from the audiences", "made a name for himself", "came into the limelight", "very appreciated", and similar statements without foundation. The Daily Naya Diganta makes a cryptic reference to an actor receiving an "award by an organization", but significantly doesn't name the organization. It wasn't any of the notable awards. I suppose any group can make up an award. There are no reviews of the film, and no evidence that it did well at the box office, had a substantial run in theaters, or has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.