Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TunnelCAD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:41, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TunnelCAD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not seeing notability, but software doesn't qualify for speedy and I'm reluctant to prod it because I'm not knowledgeable enough in the area to rule out notability. Google throws up nothing reliable, as far as I cna see; no hits at all on GNews or archives (exclusing false positives). HJMitchell You rang? 18:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 19:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Complete lack of secondary coverage. Nothing in google news, books or scholar. Pcap ping 05:23, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nothing on Google news, as nom points out. Not enough reliable sources (that I can find, anyway) to establish notability. Cocytus [»talk«] 15:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.