Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twin Saga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Without prejudice to recreation when/if additional sources become available. Euryalus (talk) 22:19, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Twin Saga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No significant results in the WP:VG/RS custom Google search engine. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 00:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:06, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:06, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this title, besides three sources from Siliconera. Unfortunately, they are not discussing the game's significantly, and will definitely be insufficient when it comes to writing an article. AdrianGamer (talk) 12:46, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor ^Talk! 23:07, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:24, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, there are a lot of non-English sources covering this game including zh:4Gamer.net.--Prisencolin (talk) 02:27, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as above, I googling the Chinese name "星界神話" gives a lot more results than the English translation of the title. Given that the English/NA release is fairly new, lack of American coverage is probably expected. At minimum there's a Facebook page with 118k likes and some other non American news coverage with that title too. It's certainly not a 'nobody' but it seems premature to delete what's effectively a stub based on non-English sources. Lucas "nicatronTg" Nicodemus (talk) 01:26, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Most of those linked sites are unreliable. Please link exactly which vetted vg sources you're referencing. czar 03:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:00, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources include GamerTB, and Gamer.com.tw .--Prisencolin (talk) 22:43, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.