Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twinmesh
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:49, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- Twinmesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Software with no demonstration of notability. Prod contested by author, who appears to connected with the company as evidenced by this press release. I didn't find any good sources in English, but given that the company is German maybe better references can be found in that language? --Finngall talk 18:37, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- delete - no evidence of independent notability. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:00, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:39, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:39, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as I found some links for this at News and browser but nothing to suggest better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete There's no good third-party sources here, which make this an easy delete. But solely from a reader's standpoint, the orphaned article is in industry jargon and without links to help a reader understand the most basic ideas about the topic. I still have no idea what this article is about.--69.204.153.39 (talk) 02:15, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - couldn't find anything to support notability in the search engines. Onel5969 TT me 01:19, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree with the above arguments. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 02:41, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.