Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Spalding (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tyler Spalding

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unremarkable entrepreneur and co-founder of a private tech company. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes are are trivial mentions or PR driven. Created as part of a walled garden around Raise.com, which also includes another co-founder, George Bousis. Deleted in 2014 and recreated in 2016. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:47, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:47, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:04, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:04, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:04, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:04, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt as promotional puff. No improvement since last AfD. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. The only parts of the article that are not clearly non-notable are instead clearly promotional. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:31, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Although the article is strikingly promotional in tone, there is a kernal of biographical details that can be flushed out of the sources. Regardless of whether there is WP:COI the subject probably meets the WP:GNG threshold.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:41, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 11:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.