Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFO sightings in Portugal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:12, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UFO sightings in Portugal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no indication of notability and the article is written based entirely on unreliable sources. $ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it.$ 16:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, two (suspect) items does not a list make. Geschichte (talk) 19:42, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no notability and no RS about sums it up. DoctorJoeE ^{review transgressions}/_{talk to me!} 22:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

notifications: Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 20:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]; Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 20:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]; Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]; Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - we are not a directory of the dubious. Neutrality^talk 06:35, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia is not the National Enquirer. Guy (Help!) 23:04, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
merge with list of UFO sightings.Slatersteven (talk) 15:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable enough for stand alone article. - LuckyLouie (talk) 13:56, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just a list of non-notable HOAXES. Ajf773 (talk) 12:08, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nothing worth merging or redirecting either Spiderone 12:17, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's what "they" would want. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:26, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
merge to List of reported UFO sightings, or similar. At least one of the sources is not non-reliable, Jornal de Notícias is a decent newspapper. The said news article reports that the (second) sighting was studied by University Fernando Pessoa, from an historic point of view. Havins a news report 20 years after the event, also hints to some persistent notability. That some of you do not believe in UFO sighting, and I also would not bet that is was a UFO sighting, does not make it a hoax, the sighting was likely real, what was sighted is not certain. The article's first sighting is weaker, because the one reference to Jornal de Notícias leads to a dead page, but I presume it would not hurt to merge and see if it get better attention there.Nabla (talk) 11:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.