Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulf Söderberg
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Ulf Söderberg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks like a vanity piece, editor has only contributed to this article[1], it does not meet WP:GNG, and has WP:BLP/WP:RS problems. ColonelHenry (talk) 06:03, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. ProtossPylon 22:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. This has been deleted several times on the Swedish Wikipedia - initially as non-notable, then as a re-creation. I do find lots of mentions online in Swedish, but a lot appear to be negative about Bringwell. Yngvadottir (talk) 05:11, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Notability is not proved by the given sources. There are several issues with the article. Grrahnbahr (talk) 19:06, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.