Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncovered (Sirsy album)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If anyone wishes to merge the content, please let me know. Stifle (talk) 19:42, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Uncovered (Sirsy album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. No realistic redirect value at this time. Delete. — C M B J 10:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm not finding any significant coverage for this album in reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM. Gongshow Talk 18:05, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 23:18, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Band is primarily of local (Albany, NY) interest. Album doesn't have coverage or importance. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The album has received coverage in Billboard and Starpulse.com, but these are just listings of information about the album. Are these enough to establish notability? Per the Billboard source, the album has never charted. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:29, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Those sources, and others like them, establish merely that the album exists. WP:NALBUMS suggests: "That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article." An article may be warranted if there is significant coverage - for example, reviews, features or commentary of some kind - or at least evidence that the album charted somewhere, none of which appears to be the case here. Gongshow Talk 02:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the response. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:13, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Those sources, and others like them, establish merely that the album exists. WP:NALBUMS suggests: "That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article." An article may be warranted if there is significant coverage - for example, reviews, features or commentary of some kind - or at least evidence that the album charted somewhere, none of which appears to be the case here. Gongshow Talk 02:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into the main band article Sirsy. They're primarily a touring/party band (disclosure: I've seen them several times), and while notable, I don't see proof their CD has gotten wide coverage or reviews. Willing to be convinced otherwise. Bearian (talk) 22:33, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.