Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Union Bay Post Office

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 13:59, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Union Bay Post Office

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that it has the coverage or significance to meet WP:N Boleyn (talk) 13:58, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:13, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Being one of two surviving wooden post offices in Canada is impressive. The article says that it was given heritage building status after the restoration, but this may just be by the local municipality rather than a national recognition. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:35, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added a newspaper article from the Comox Valley Record as a reference. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:58, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 16:36, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – combining this article with the one Eastmain found yields a clear GNG pass, in my view. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:21, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thanks again to the work put in by Eastmain since the deletion nomination. NemesisAT (talk) 18:58, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the two references mentioned above establish notability. Nfitz (talk) 00:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.