Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Union of Estonian Architects

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:56, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Union of Estonian Architects

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Concerns had been previously raised through a tag that notability of said subject is unclear as per WP:SIGCOV. Relies on primary sources as of now. No multiple secondary sources to make a pass of WP:SIGCOV. The Estonian version of said article isn't much of a help in verifying notability either. nearlyevil 665 06:03, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. nearlyevil 665 06:03, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nearlyevil665: rather speedy keep. Massive inbounding links, massive mentionings in web. WP:SIGCOV per [1], [2] (whole book dedicated to this organization), [3], [4] --Estopedist1 (talk) 06:13, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:18, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Organisations of this type are usually notable, and there are probably good enough coverage in Estonian sources. Geschichte (talk) 10:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. There are very good, independent, non-primary sources for the association. Sirp has a very detailed history of the association. Eesti Rahvusringhääling has a feature on Andro Mänd elected as the president of the organization. The Museum of Estonian Architecture profiles the earliest members of the Union of Estonian Architects. There was a book edited by Krista Karu (EAL 1921-1996, published by Solnessi Arhitektuurikirjastus. ISBN: 9985902416) detailing the history of the organization published in 1999. There are countless articles (easily found) about the association giving awards. Articles about the anniversary of the founding here, listings for projects and exhibits and competitions and awards here, here, here, here, here, here, etc. There seems to be either some sort of bias or lackadaisical approach to some of these nominations. WP:BEFORE would have been useful. ExRat (talk) 11:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.