Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unobtanium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect seems to be best here unless other users (such as 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR can comment) but until this article is better, I'm not seeing much else (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 04:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unobtanium

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable at all Hannasnow (talk) 16:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree that this subject is not notable, but I propose a merge with Bitcoin.Mr.Bob.298 (talk) 18:01, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Unobtainium as alternate spelling.--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 18:35, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Unobtainium GNews and GBooks searches reveals overwhelming use as the fictional element than anything else. This is the topmost hit for the currency I find (2nd page on GNews) [1] 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 08:24, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Unobtainium as alternate spelling. — Cirt (talk) 22:12, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.