Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unreal Tournament 3 Tweaker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Scientizzle 16:08, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Unreal Tournament 3 Tweaker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article was up for a prod but the article creator objected on the talk page so I removed the prod. This article is written more like a manual for the software and less like an encyclopedia article. It is unverified as it has no reliable sources at all, and fails to establish why it is notable. Essentially this article is about a mod for a popular game written by a fan of the game, one of countless available and there is nothing to distinguish it from all the other fan-created mods and tweaks available for the game. -- Atamachat 15:26, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. —Atamachat 15:26, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a place to advertise your software. Possible speedy delete per A7 or G11. Percy Snoodle (talk) 15:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, per Percy Snoodle. – ukexpat (talk) 17:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as blatant advertising. Biruitorul (talk) 18:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 03:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someoneanother 15:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. The article reads like a guide or manual. There are no sources included to indicate verifiability or notability and a quick search indicates there is unlikely to be. While there's a lot of forum discussion on the topic, I haven't been able to locate any reliable sources on it. Gazimoff (talk) 18:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.