Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uyama Hiroto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uyama Hiroto

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, and Japan. UtherSRG (talk) 14:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:MUSICBIO. Strong evidence for a well-established career and is well known and well-liked by the social media crowd and music fans. scope_creep^Talk

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If our subject is "well known and well liked" by people, someone should notify them to try for a few sources that'd support an article here about him. Try as I might I find zilch. We cannot keep this by simply asserting "he is notable". And the fact that a single-purpose account needed to be drafted for the article's appearance is telling. -The Gnome (talk) 16:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:16, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lack of any coverage for this musician. Even using [1] to try and find sources in Gnews, there are none that show up. Oaktree b (talk) 23:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.