Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VKernel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Non-admin closure by Skomorokh 00:06, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

VKernel

Deleted in the prod process (even with two prod tags), now recreated. This is a procedural nomination, no opinion from my side. Tone 09:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - How can I change the page to keep it from being deleted?--patrick.c.knight (talk) 13:17, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep To answer Patrick, the deletion log shows that the previous version was deleted for 'notability' (presumably lack thereof). WP:NOTE and WP:CORP explain the general notability guidelines and those for companies. However, looking at the current sources I'd say that [1], [2] and [3] satisfy the latter's statement that "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources."—Preceding unsigned comment added by Olaf Davis (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Scientizzle 15:54, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. Passes WP:CORP, if only by a hair. The Byte and Switch article looks good, I'm not quite sure about [4] and [5], but I'd call it significant and reliable. --Amalthea^Talk 11:29, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep just notable enough per guidelines I'd say. RMHED (talk) 23:12, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.