Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vahagn Stepanyan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Someone should probably do a sockpuppet investigation on these comments. LOL Missvain (talk) 00:26, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vahagn Stepanyan

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is basically that he has "collaborated with" many well-known artists, but in and of itself does not show how he is notable. I am unable to find significant discussion of the artist in multiple reliable sources. I also had to trim a bunch of promotional content. ... discospinster _talk 17:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 17:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 17:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: He collaborates with world-famous musicians and has released albums--Ապատ63 (talk) 19:34, 1 December 2020 (UTC)— Ապատ63 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

I think his vast collaboration with many eminent musicians and the number of albums he is engaged in is worth for keeping this article.--Poghosyan97 (talk) 19:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)— Poghosyan97 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

I am for keeping — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anna1894 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC) — Anna1894 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete - all of the keep arguments so far are a complete contradiction of WP:NOTINHERITED. If this individual cannot be sourced to anything other than Spotify, YouTube and primary sources like Stepanyan Studios then he does not warrant inclusion. Spiderone 19:56, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - He is notable becauase of his collaboration with well-known artists and a number of his own albums released, also because of the vast number of studios he is currently endorsed by.--XenonX88 (talk) 20:00, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - He is a famous artist and has appeares on many projects as as a music producer, songwriter, composer etc. and has collaborated with artists from different countries․ I think the article needs to be keeped. Vopyan (talk) 07:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)— Vopyan (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete per nom . No evidence of Notability , No significant coverege on independent relieble sources reliable sources , most of the sources provided are , spotify, youtube, and is own page , article fail Wikipedia Notability , nothing to talk about .Samat lib (talk) 18:55, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Samat lib. No evidence of notability, indeed. And I think this should be closed as quick as possible, since the swarm of sockpuppets are already active. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 08:25, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.