Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaidehi Taman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 09:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vaidehi Taman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sourced entirely with brand posts, outlook spotlight, press releases and other paid coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Balchandra Upendra (talk) 00:42, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 May 19. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, Journalism, and India. Shellwood (talk) 07:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nominator, the subject isn't notable. I have removed sources that are inadmissible. Nanpofira (talk) 21:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The awards look valuable but in India, it is hard to judge if the person got the award because of merit or because of connections. If only the coverage had value! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:57, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I looked a couple of news and Vaidehi Taman seems pretty notable. She honored by Government of Maharashtra. Passes WP:JOURNALIST. Zim Cout (talk) 08:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked for WP:UPE. MER-C 16:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The subject obviously meets Wikipedia guidelines based on her awards and work, with enough reliable sources to prove the notability --SouthernNights (talk) 14:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:49, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Not all state awards are notable. In this case, there's a little bit of WP:NOTYET about it and I respectfully disagree that she passes WP:JOURNALIST.Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 13:49, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per SouthernNights the journalist obviously meets WP:GNG. Worldsolarpower (talk) 14:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete References are PR, profiles, clickbait and low-quality sources. It no more "obviously notable" that you. scope_creep^Talk 21:48, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - undisclosed paid-for spam, created by a Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xenen1970 sockpuppet. Not eligible for G5 deletion. MER-C 16:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails both WP:GNG WP:JOURNALIST. It also reeks for WP:COI. -- Choose🎵 (talk) 06:54, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.