Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valence Industries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valence Industries

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP. John from Idegon (talk) 05:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - including searches for Uley graphite project and Strategic Energy Resources Limited turns up enough. Given the time frame involved (well over 100 years), a search of paper based sources should turn up more. At worst, can be merged with the Uley graphite project article. VMS Mosaic (talk) 23:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:17, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Easily passes GNG from sources showing in the footnotes. A historic operation, an industry leader in its country, etc. = worthy of encyclopedic coverage. Not an entirely terrible piece either, as business articles go — for what it's worth. Carrite (talk) 06:16, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.