Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valorie Armstrong
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Valorie Armstrong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NACTOR… no notable roles. Bgsu98 (talk) 18:48, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Television. Bgsu98 (talk) 18:48, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:01, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Two brief mentions here in newspapers: [1] from the early 1970s, might be more in offline sources. I doubt it based on her short career and list of mostly bit parts. Oaktree b (talk) 12:12, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete none of these roles amount to multiple significant roles in notable productions.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:46, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.