Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanathi Srinivasan (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 14:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vanathi Srinivasan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I would like to reopen the deletion discussion as I clearly believes this article does not pass WP:GNG. One of the two users IphisOfCrete who opposed deletion in previous AFD is now blocked for abusing multiple accounts. The subject has never won any assembly or national elections, neither held any major public post to merit an individual article. The citations given in the articles is just a clear case of WP:REFBOMB. None of the sources are also not covering about her in depth. Its primary coverage is about the events that the subject was involved. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 07:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 07:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 07:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 07:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 07:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I may not like her politics but she is clearly notable at the national-level as a lawyer and politically. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 16:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Notable as per second point of WP:Politician. - AppuduPappudu (talk) 18:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The actions of other editors are irrelevant in determining notability; fruit of the poison tree has no status here. Nationally-renown far-right ideologue, president of the BJP women's front. Passes WP:NPOL and the GNG.--Goldsztajn (talk) 01:44, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.