Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasiljka Jezovšek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:57, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vasiljka Jezovšek

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for BLP sourcing issues since 2019. Only source is to bachcantatas which is a website anyone can edit and is unreliable. Not clear the subject passes WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 23:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Germany. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:55, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok to delete, though I have added sources and removed most of the extraneous detail sourced to her biography on the Bach Cantatas Website, so it reads like less of a CV or promotional article. Does not meet WP:GNG. Despite a couple of favorable mentions in The Times (including the one from 1996 now quoted and cited within the article, which is likely one of her most positive reviews), in general there is a dearth of coverage found in English or German over the course of her career (only 10 hits on ProQuest, most of which turn out to be mentions), and the one recording review in Rondo magazine is quite negative, such that I would imagine if it were up to her she probably wouldn't think it was worth having a Wikipedia article if she had to see it quoted there. Please ping me if anyone finds additional coverage. Cielquiparle (talk) 20:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.