Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ved Rahi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 08:42, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ved Rahi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:POV, WP:BLP issue. Non encyclopedic article. Layout etc donot seems ok. Heba Aisha (talk) 19:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:37, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:38, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is not enough sourcing here to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:36, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per WP:GNG and WP:TNT. Created by an Wikipedian who appeared in the Wild West days of 2006, and who stopped editing in 2007. Based on his IMDB listing, he seems to have been a writer of no importance who was given direction and production credits sometimes. Based on what I Googled, he appears to have written a book about writing, and published three books of short stories. I just spent an afternoon rescuing another article, and this needs a ton of work that seems to be a hopeless cause. Google searches reveal very wide but shallow coverage. Bearian (talk) 00:17, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:57, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:21, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:14, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or draftify. Tend to delete... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 13:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If you read this article through and through, it is almost as if the writer of it was purposely adding comments to make it seem as if the subject passed WP:FILMMAKER or even WP:GNG, when in reality, this person fails multiple points in both. On top of it, this article cites zero references. It's overall an incredibly poorly written and incredibly poorly formatted article that should be deleted. Coreykai (talk) 14:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.