Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verbti
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy close, nomination retracted
- Verbti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced stub on an alleged figure of Albanian folk mythology. Was originally sourced to "Encyclopedia Mythica", recently debunked as a thoroughly unreliable source (Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive214#Unreliable source alert: "Encyclopedia Mythica" (pantheon.org)). Was previously included in a group AfD of Enc.Myth.-related articles which was speedy-closed, but no improvement has been seen on the article since. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:00, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep - The term is explained in great detail by this book: Elsie, Robert (2001). A dictionary of Albanian religion, mythology and folk culture. p. 259. ISBN 978-1850655701. I'm also troubled by the fact that pantheon.org/articles/e/eisa.html is described as "total nonsense" in an effort that ultimately resulted in blacklisting the website, because the content of that page is echoed by a number of books, one dating back as far as 115 years. — C M B J 20:08, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - significant coverage in reliable sources is demonstrate through GoogleBooks. Claritas § 20:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per sources found above, which are not the only ones. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 20:20, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Retract nomination, the Elsie source is good enough. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:27, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.