Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinod Thomas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:18, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vinod Thomas

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely failing notability. Lacking independent sources to verify notability. Most coverage appears to be primary, such as profiles published by institutions he is connected with (e.g. university or NGO profiles), contributor profiles for various newspapers or blogs. The Books appear to be publications by his place of work (such as World Bank reviews) where he was a contributing author for section(s) as part of his role. Divisional organisational leadership roles are not inherently notable. There is a lack of coverage about Thomas. His output seems largely verifiable in primary sources, but that does not pass the threshold test for NAUTHOR, NPROF or GNG. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He is not the primary subject of WP:RS.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:03, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:22, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 01:55, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.