Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visual queen of the year '93
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ѕandahl 16:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Visual queen of the year '93 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) –
Notability concerns - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 13:30, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Visual Queen of The Year '93: Yuki Uchida - La Palette now redirects to this article. If this AfD results in 'delete', admin please delete this redirect too. - Richard Cavell (talk) 01:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the fact that one of the five models happened to become famous later does not make the book notable. Also a lack of sources --T-rex 15:23, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Dekkappai (talk) 18:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Dele per nom; et per T-rex Ron B. Thomson (talk) 20:37, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment there's also a related article Visual Queen of The Year '93: Yuki Uchida - La Palette, with a category of its own. 70.55.86.157 (talk) 05:18, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I speedily redirected it to the subject of this AfD. - Richard Cavell (talk) 01:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please remember not to leave the category Category:Japanese idol movie empty and delete it when the time comes. 70.55.86.139 (talk) 05:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I've deleted the empty category. PhilKnight (talk) 17:54, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I speedily redirected it to the subject of this AfD. - Richard Cavell (talk) 01:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Gman124 talk 04:47, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.