The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Advertorial and unconvincing article for a 3-year-old or so company with none of the coverage sources ever not being about the following: news about funding, partnerships or financing, interviews, trivial coverage such as interviews and business profiles or PR or PR-like mentions; my own searches are essentially finding this as well, even after searching Indian news sources. SwisterTwistertalk07:08, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The company has been in existence for over 3 years with 8000+ news links, across important publications like The Times of India, Hindu Business Line, Indian Express, Hindustan Times, Economic Times, Financial Express etc. These are not PR or paid publications at all. The company is one of the popular e-commerce players in India. The tone of the content maybe re-written to be in-sync with Wikipedia guidelines, but the page be kept. Becktea (talk) 17:10, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The e-commerce website has 10 million registered users with 8 million app downloads, making it an established and notable player in the market. Angreza (talk) 09:30, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
