Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W64 Self-rescuer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:32, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

W64 Self-rescuer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability guidelines for products. A source search shows little independent, reliable coverage and the article is written like an advert-manual hybrid. DrStrauss talk 12:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- What a cool device! No point to include this advertisement when there is a perfectly good and balanced article at Self-contained_self-rescue_device that wasn't written by a SPA. Rhadow (talk) 18:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Reads like an advert, no point bothering. --QEDK (愛 • 海) 19:38, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.