Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wabel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as nonsense. Blueboy96 17:30, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Wabel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Was tagged for speedy (under WP:CSD#G1, nonsense) by Realkyhick but contested by Jake the Editor Man, who proposed transwikiing to Wiktionary. It seems very like a word someone made up in school one day, and I can't find any reference to it on a Google search. Olaf Davis | Talk 16:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speediest delete possible. I can't believe that someone removed the speedy-delete tag that I placed, and replaced it with a tag to ship it off to Wiktionary and let them deal with it. This is patent nonsense, pure and simple, and should have never gotten to the AfD stage in the first place. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:39, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Neologism, no source, no confirmation from anywhere else, a classic example of a word made up in school one day. Don't waste Wiktionary's time with this. I recently proposed a new speedy for this kind of thing, but the consensus was that existing speedy criteria like G1 and G3 were adequate, so I'm afraid we'll have to go on wasting time with AfDs like this one. JohnCD (talk) 16:48, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.