Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter C. Quintard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:31, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Walter C. Quintard

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Quintard's only claim to fame is having served as mayor of South Norwalk, Connecticut. This is a defunct city, which does not preclude notability of its mayor's, but the city is not of such significance its mayors are default notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:46, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep -- I took a lot of time and effort doing research to cover what I feel is my area of responsibility (i.e. the history of Norwalk, Connecticut). The city of Norwalk is of a sufficient size that its mayors would qualify as notable. The city of South Norwalk was merged with the city of Norwalk, and as such the history of that area *is* the history of the current city of Norwalk. Is it the intention of this proposer to also propose all the numerous others? That is a lot of time and effort wasted, and history lost for a fairly substantially sized city. I was a significant contributor for many years, but I really am very discouraged by what Wikipedia has become. Greg Bard 205.172.173.250 (talk) 18:00, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in that local politicians are notable with sufficient coverage. This article, however, needs a lot of additional material to make it worthwhile. Billy Hathorn (talk) 01:36, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Mayor of a city that only has a population of 87,000 now (which is far from being big enough to make its mayor inherently notable), let alone when he was mayor. No sources beyond the basics. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:21, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:15, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The nomination's argument is classic WP:NOTBIGENOUGH but "Notability isn't determined by something's quantity of members, but rather by the quality of the subject's verifiable, reliable sources." We have a guy currently at RfA who has been working for years on a place with a pop of just over 300 and most everyone seems to think that's wonderful. Andrew D. (talk) 09:19, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.