Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Mech
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:31, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Walter Mech (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unofficial name for star, not recognised by any scientific authority. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 20:25, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable person, not a recognized name for the star, and looks a bit like spam for the webpage. Hairhorn (talk) 21:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non-notable with no sources. Derild4921☼ 01:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as there is absolutely no indication of notability. Additionaly Wikipedia is not the news or a guide to find stars. Armbrust Talk Contribs 11:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - vanity star naming - not notable -- Whpq (talk) 15:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- no notability demonstrated in any source, and no sources to support the claims. N2e (talk) 19:33, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.