Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warwick Speakers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warwick Speakers

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable university society. Article relies entirely on primary sources. A search for reliable sources doesn't turn anything up Dexxtrall (talk) 16:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Cannot see how this can be possibly be notable. Anything of significance can be added to University of Warwick. Edwardx (talk) 17:50, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:15, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I do not think this page deserves to be on Wikipedia. It is just a university society, how come is this up on Wikipedia?--Discologist (talk) 11:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:31, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails NORG bigtime. All primary sources, no reliable independent secondary sources available. Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 12:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: coverage is weak and reliable sources not found. TheDreamBoat (talk) 04:20, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious Delete. There are almost no student societies that are notable, and neither the article nor the purported sources give any reason to believe that this one is. RomanSpa (talk) 23:57, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This student society clearly isn't notable. I don't even think it's worth a redirect. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:37, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.