Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Washington University of Science and Technology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify.. Liz Read! Talk! 05:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Washington University of Science and Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It was created by a user who was blocked indefinitely because their username was promotional of the page itself. Looking at the history reveals that the majority of the information added to the page at one point was due to promotional users as well. A News search shows 1 result which isn't in English. There's a scholar result but it references "University of Washington" and "University of Science and Technology of China", not "Washington University of Science and Technology." NYT has never written about it. JStor has also never had any articles about or from them. Wozal (talk) 02:23, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, its name was just changed from "IGlobal University", are there any sources found referencing this name?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: There are a few sources for IGlobal University:
Some of the above are passing mentions or a listing on a site where it appears the college submitted information, so not independent. There may be other sources for this school, but perhaps not in English. There are many sources about a "harmony search algorithm" by Prof. Zong Woo Geem of iGlobal University, who may be notable, but so far there do not appear to be enough RS in English to meet the requirements of SIGCOV, to pass GNG.WP:NORG, which is the guideline for institutions that are for-profit. Perhaps an editor with Bangladeshi linguist skills will be able to find more thorough sourcing? — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 21:22, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.