Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Well (solitaire)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well (solitaire)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability requirements. Also insufficient information for verifying content - only one obscure source provided in Russian. Gregorytopov (talk) 00:24, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Pahiy (talk) 00:29, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is non-notable (WP:GNG and WP:NRVE). This is an extremely obscure game, is not implemented by the popular solitaire sites and software programs, and there appears to be no reference to it online beside one commercial Russian site. There are literally hundreds and hundreds of solitaire card games in existence, and only the most notable ones are included in Wikipedia; including this ahead of the far more common ones that have been excluded can't be justified based on the evidence provided. Gregorytopov (talk) 01:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree with Gregory above. This does not meet WP:GNG Spiderone 08:29, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yeah, as of now, its just a rule guide. Le Panini (^{Talk to}_me?) 14:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Needs better sources. At best, redirect to some list of soliaires. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:06, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NRVE.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:41, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like this page is going to be deleted. Can I move it to my user space? Iorsh (talk) 10:43, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.