Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheeljack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 15:30, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wheeljack

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article currently fails to establish notability. The one reception link does not currently work, but it seems like a trivial mention anyway. TTN (talk) 13:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 13:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 13:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 13:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There appear to be no academic or journalistic sources that discuss this character. Furthermore, the IGN article is merely a list of the website's favourite characters in the franchise. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 16:32, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. lullabying (talk) 00:19, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails NFICTION/GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:50, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clear case of non notability. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:48, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.