Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White pixelization (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 02:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

White pixelization

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

White pixelization is a fringe notion that fails WP:GNG. The article has existed for two and a half years now but there have been found no reliable sources where white pixelization is the main topic, and in most of the sources it's only given about one paragraph. (Nordfront and Metapedia, of course, aren't WP:RS.) For what it's worth, the Swedish article was deleted as non-notable. Sjö (talk) 07:22, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources: some of the few search results are talking about "black and white pixelization" and so are not relevant to this. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 23:32, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a few years have gone by, and still no reliable source that states that this was ever wide spread. The conspiracy that this is something that is ongoing has not gather enough coverage either. GameOn (talk) 07:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete at best and draft and userfy because this is imaginably better but delete for now. SwisterTwister talk 03:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.