Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WhyAbe.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the nomination was delete. Sango123 17:21, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Advertisement. Cheese Sandwich 02:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:CORP and probably WP:ADS ... will someone check ABCOffice for this also (please) DavidHumphreys SPEAK TO MEABOUT THE THINGS I MESSED UP 02:50, 28 November 2024 UTC [refresh]
- Xavor also deserves a look. On the same topic, I would bet that the marketing director of every company out there would cut-n-paste their PR newswire description into a Wikipedia article... I wonder if there's an automated way to detect these. --Cheese Sandwich 02:40, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I've proded Xavor, feel free to support... Pascal.Tesson 03:30, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Author just vandalized the page... I've reverted the vandalism, however FYI re this. --Cheese Sandwich 15:30, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete blatant spam. The other edit by the creator of the page is the spam-addition of an external link. This should have been proded. Pascal.Tesson 03:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete spam spam spam... --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:17, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Pure canned luncheon meat --IslaySolomon 04:37, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:SPAM. Wikipedia is not free ad space. --DarkAudit 14:49, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam and see WP:WEB - articles should be written about the history, achievements or culture of the site, not what it offers to customers. SM247My Talk 23:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: this is above and beyond the call of SPAM. Dear God, what the Blistering Blue Fuck does provide free procurement tools and promote collaboration between buyers and suppliers in a global marketplace mean? --die Baumfabrik 05:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.