Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wickedleak Wammy Passion X

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 04:09, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wickedleak Wammy Passion X

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable smart phone, also seems like an advertisement page. No links go here either. Wgolf (talk) 23:59, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The smartphone mentioned in the article is non notable. Furthermore, the article has been written like an advertisement.--Skr15081997 (talk) 06:45, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 02:33, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:PRODUCT. There seems to be a reasonable amount of independent coverage out there.[1][2][3] What's needed is some more balanced reviews which reflect the concerns expressed by some users. But that's a content issue. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 19:35, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:54, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Quite popular smartphone in India. I can find many reliable and significant sources after a quick search. [4] & [5] among a few. I agree with Trevj. I also don't find it like an advert. Harsh (talk) 11:13, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Upon a source review, passes WP:GNG. Examples include: [6], [7], [8], [9]. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.