Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiering Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiering Software

Nom - fails WP:CORP, has produced no notable software (WP:SOFTWARE), unsourced article since August 2006. Rklawton 16:01, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 04:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. See nothing notable, no software, etc. Philippe Beaudette 05:48, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Has several products, and this page could be a single place to discuss them all: Super Worms, Charlie the Duck, Charlie II. OTOH, these games don't seem notable (all are AfD at this time), and "a collection of non-notable things" is not necessarily "a notable container article". So need at least something of notability of the company or at least one of the games before I'd say "keep". DMacks 06:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Looking through the google hits for "Wiering Software", all I see is the company site and a ton of freeware/shareware download sites. What I couldn't find was any newspaper articles, etc. about either Mike Wiering or Wiering Software. wieringsoftware.nl gets an Alexa rank of 473,445 [1]. A quick look at the sites linking in shows a bunch of download sites, but no magazines or newspapers. So as far as I can tell, this is just someone who's written a few shareware games, probably makes a little money selling them from his website, but none of the published works listed in WP:SOFTWARE seem to have anything to say about him or his company. Dave6 07:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. MER-C 11:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. The article says itself that it's "small". --TeckWiz^Talk Contribs_@ 00:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.