Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiGadugi Website
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 18:32, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged for speedy as empty, but not empty. It is, however, plainly vanispamcruftisement. Just zis Guy you know? 20:27, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nonsense, incoherent TonySt 20:36, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete unreadable nonsense. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:02, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Some sort of cut-and-paste confusion, not an article.Obina 22:46, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The "article" has some vague relevance to Jeffrey_Vernon_Merkey and as the latest chapter in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Waya_sahoni#Outside_Statement_by_Wikigadugi_Project. Probably the gist of the "article" should be merged into Jeffrey_Vernon_Merkey itself. -- talks_to_birds 23:17, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 05:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Khoikhoi 05:54, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Just a thought about some of the comments here. Just because you don't understand something, or have not looked into any background before you reach a judgement, does not make it "vanispamcruftisement", "nonsense, incoherent", "unreadable nonsense", or "Some sort of cut-and-paste confusion".
- But thanks for the insight into "process" around here... -- talks_to_birds 16:22, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Merkey's websites tend to have very short lifespans. This is the second time he has created wikigadugi. An article can be written about it later if it survives past his current tantrum and becomes notable enough. Currently, I don't think it even deserves a mention in Jeffrey Vernon Merkey. — MediaMangler 22:24, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There is no point in documenting every hickup and outburst of Jeff Merkey here; they generally are no more than that. --MJ(☎|@|C) 07:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.