Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Wedig
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Courcelles (talk) 00:37, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- William Wedig (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no notability shown for this (auto?)bio. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:39, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Only one of his films has gotten a significant no. of IMDb votes (Rise of the Dead) and that one got a terrible rating (3.4). Clarityfiend (talk) 02:25, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I've added a few references to the article. It seems that his film, Forged, is a pretty big deal in the independent film market, which is understandable, considering the actors starring in it. From that and the other things that he has worked on, he appears notable to me. SilverserenC 08:52, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:01, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:01, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.