Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wine Portfolio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Sandstein 07:17, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wine Portfolio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I still confirm my PROD, I found some news sources, such as for the show visiting some towns, but I still haven't found anything particularly outstanding (for example using "Wine Portfolio CBNC World Jody Ness only found news links at News (once) and then at browsers), but still nothing convincing for solid independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 20:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I also found reliable, secondary sources lacking. The essay Wikipedia:Notability_(media)#Programming which elaborates on the general notability policy is helpful in highlighting that "the presence or absence of reliable sources is more definitive than the geographic range of the program's audience alone." The essay is further helpful in pointing out that "the media does not often report on itself. It is not often that one media outlet will give neutral attention to another, as this could be seen as 'advertising for the competition.'" Thus, despite the fact that the program reportedly airs in 40 countries, it still needs reliable sources to support notability and its continued existence within the encyclopedia. Those are not evident. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 16:31, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:48, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.