Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wisconsin Forensic Coaches Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wisconsin Forensic Coaches Association

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources are cited in-article and my own searches have only turned up primary sourcing and a few passing mentions, with no significant third-party coverage. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)^{Talk to Me!} 00:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)^{Talk to Me!} 00:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Unsurprisingly my own searches produce similar results. Waggers TALK 12:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Wisconsin. Shellwood (talk) 14:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, subject to a previous AFD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wisconsin Forensics Coaches Association.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:43, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. My search turned up nothing, too. I find the keep argument from the previous AfD to be uncovincing (arguing it either as 'very important part of high school' or 'since we have an article on the national organization, chapters should have articles too similar to sports teams in a sports league having articles'). The first is an ILIKEIT argument, and the second falls apart upon inspecting the state of the national article (National Speech and Debate Association, and in 2009 too [1]) which has doubtful notability; the argument would carry more weight if the organization was more important, thus generating more coverage. —Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 21:19, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.