Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Witnesses requested by Guantanamo detainees

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Combatant Status Review Tribunal. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:19, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Witnesses requested by Guantanamo detainees

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short permastub, list with a single entry. References exist but they do not indicate the notability of "witnesses requested by Guantanamo detainees" as a distinct concept. Stifle (talk) 14:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 15:13, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 15:13, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 15:13, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 15:13, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Combatant Status Review Tribunal. Content is not problematic but struggles to hold up as a standalone article. If more cases can be provided in addition to the request made by Abdullah Mujahid, then I will change my decision to a "Weak Keep". Dobbyelf62 (talk) 17:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:05, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Dobbyelf62. Fails WP:NOTNEWS for now. Santosh L (talk) 15:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.