Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolfgang H. Paul (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:27, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wolfgang H. Paul

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subject that does not meet WP:BASIC. This source in the article only provides a name check, which is not significant coverage, and the only other independent source in the article, which is unlinked, is from the 2007 Deseret News Church Almanac. However, multiple, independent reliable sources that provide significant coverage are necessary, not just one. Various WP:BEFORE searches have only provided name checks and very fleeting passing mentions in usable sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:51, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:51, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:51, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:52, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not seeing the significant coverage in independent reliable sources that would help the subject meet WP:GNG. PohranicniStraze (talk) 05:55, 14 October 2018 (UTC)j[reply]
Delete Sources in article are not independent (Liahona, Church News), not reliable ("Grampa Bill"), or completely trivial mentions (Deseret News). The almanac source is not independent, as it is assembled by the staff of Church News, an official church publication ([1]). Search does not find significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, so subject does not pass WP:GNG. Worth noting that the article's notability claims are LDS-specific ("inaugurating full time missionary work in East Germany"), suggesting that subject likely did not attract non-LDS coverage. Willing to reconsider if significant coverage emerges. Bakazaka (talk) 08:40, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.