Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Youth Organization (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 01:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

World Youth Organization

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Part of same self-promotion drive as Subi and The Future India Party. No indication of notability. Soman (talk) 22:06, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:10, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:10, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - i vote to keep because the subject has enough significance in our state. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.219.206.71 (talk) 12:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Can't find much about this organisation nor about its "sister-articles" Subi and The Future India Party. They exist, sure, but so far I don't see them meet the notability guidelines. Yintan 14:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the subject has notability as per wiki guidelines, there are notable events about the organisation which is sufficient for notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.62.182.35 (talk) 15:50, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable enough mirroring the other articles relating to this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.182.145.241 (talk) 20:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notable enough with respect to Wikipedia, this article is the original article approved to exist twice during the last two AFDs with similar title proposals of various organizations with similar or relevant names, so please don't confuse this article with previously deleted articles with similar names, this is the only approved article to exist till date. Social Informer (talk) 11:43, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, Social Informer (talk · contribs) appears to have a WP:COI issue here, and the IPs 27.62.227.94 (talk · contribs) and 103.219.206.71 (talk · contribs) has zero edits unrelated to the Subi/FIP/WYO articles. As the nominator, I now regret to having included all three articles in a single nomination. --Soman (talk) 20:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.